
|
|
Jon Wagner on Dwayne Moser

"Untitled Backdrop (Location where
Anne Heche was found wandering and incoherent," 8/19/00) acrylic
on muslin
THE IN-BETWEEN CROWD: DWAYNE MOSER:
LEMON SKY - LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Dwayne Moser's recent exhibition, titled Below the Line and
displayed at Lemon Sky Projects in Los Angeles, consisted of backdrop
paintings, screenplay drawings, and photographs. The show highlighted
not only Moser's diverse output, but also his continued interest in what
the artist refers to as Hollywood and Its Discontents. The
work produces an atmosphere of melancholy irony as palpable and yet diffuse
as his city's celebrated smog. Celebration-or Moser's calibration of celebrity-escapes,
for once, its lineage in camp and contempt, only to achieve the lonely
dasein, elsewhere and everywhere, of sincere paradox.
Paradox, or perhaps better, parafiction, characterizes much of Moser's
work. He charts real incident and locale, scandal and squalid side-street,
within a palm-lined glamour that argues mythical LA is LA. Worldview as
event-publicity, promotion, misstep or stunt-means reality never survives
us here, and yet here is where we're going. This facticity, the precise
temporal and spatial realism of a 21x 35 C print of Winona
Ryder's Saks Fifth Avenue transfigured in its projection aspect ratio
of 1:1.85 by backdrop painters at Warner Brothers into a 6'x 11'1
piece of scenic design, this thereness overcomes itself even as it overwhelms
our impulse to snicker. Or simply to discount it as a slick piece of scenery.
There is such a sad and surprising liminality to it all, off-screen returned
to big screen, private rut to cause celebré. Such a spectacular
ordinariness to it all, those crazy stars, condemned to a contaminant
existence somewhere between life and role.
In Moser's hands, the stars themselves-Ryder, Hugh Grant, Anne Heche,
Margot Kidder, Eddie Murphy, Robert Downey Jr, Matthew McConaughey-suffer
exile from the sites of their disgrace, in the transference of site from
one medium and author to another, and they suffer their own decline from
star into personality, into mere signifiers of consumed celebrity. The
30x 22 panels of one minute screen time Moser gives them as
script fodder parafictionalizes unfortunate incident back into cinematic
fate. And we feel infected by our own narrative expectations, saddened
if not sickened by our spectatorial lust.
The complexity of this melancholy irony is again highlighted by the apparent
sincerity with which Moser reproduces the domestic mishaps of public icons.
Meticulous research, respect for time, light, and location, speculation
based only on the evidence left behind: These are traces under relentless
erasure, but revived with a nearly neo-realist perplexity about what could
have happened. Yes, it feels like nostalgia, but importantly, nostalgia
for nostalgia. Susan Sontag has written in A Century of Cinema
that movies are dying with the death of cinephilia, of that pure love
of cinema no amount of grief can re-ritualize in our hyperindustrial context.
Used up husks of cinematic poetry reappear for Moser as a series of photographs
of mailboxes. The Star Map addresses tell us that behind this banality
are Rob Lowe's house, or Shirley MacLaine's or Kenny Rogers'. But we find
it hard to care except in the embarrassing effort to read persona into
the over-determined ruggedness of Rogers' mailbox, or the suspicious prettiness
of Lowe's. Hey, there's Michael Caine's half-life!
Questions of authorship cannot help but arise within Moser's practice
of anonymous transfer and borrowed appeal. If cinephliac exultation used
to inspire other kinds of artists to make films, is Moser's flickering
fascination with filmdom an auteurism in decay? In an article for the
LA Times Book Review (3/23/03) called Missing the story, Robert
W. Cort bemoans a literary decadence that fails to portray the particularity,
the complexity of the men and women who choose and make our movies,
and so fails to tell good stories. Not since Fitzgerald's The Last Tycoon
has the whole equation of filmmaking escaped the venality
and stupidity of mere exposé, even as the industry strolls the
abyss of an army of film students with digital cameras and maxed
out credit cards. Moser is clearly engaged in a pursuit of movie
magic, but is his stalk parasitical? Is the authorship that seems to deconstruct
itself in the video piece Exposure-a 21 minute long take of Moser's talking
head reciting celebrity interview quotes with autobiographical resignation:
I've always wanted to be my own person so bad-the Barthesian
death of authorship?
Maybe so, except for Moser this death typically enlivens the corpse with
elegiac poignancy. If, as Foucault reminds us in What Is an Author?
authorship has always functioned to define perspective and authorize choice,
then to announce the author's disappearance must serve a rather desperate
task. What is being normalized? What crisis banalized, what permanent
criticality made chronic? For Foucault, it is the scandal of freeplay,
of an endlessly slipping signification no longer struggling for Difference
and Meaning as much as for sheer similarity and exchange. The sheer circulation
and consumption of meaning as celebrity is the death of authorship authorizing
its own demise.
The symptomatic evidence of this self-standing signification in defiance
of any true self is, of course, Hollywood, presided over and authorized
by the Sign itself. Moser's Reverse Shot photos of the Hollywood
Sign, architecturally broken into particular letters, photographed from
behind, and ready to slide into a legendary basin calmly deliberating
its own apocalypse, brilliantly recall Spectacle to its densely signified
ruse. The mimicry of truth, of personality, of an adequate response to
our own dreams and desires looms as pathetically scarred as graffiti scratched
into the Sign's monumental indifference.
One last untitled installation from a show Dwayne Moser did at CalArts
in the millennial year 2000: A microphone stand isolated on a parqueted
wooden stage, 48x 48x 59. Conventional, spot-lit in
cliché, the installation nevertheless stuns us with its blatant
evacuation of subtext and sneer. [Un]like sympathy cards for Mel Blanc
or Frank Sinatra, or the death of a stand-up comedian, the loss I'm looking
at warns me of sentimentality. But it's funny; if perpetration equals
performance and signs signal sighing, if tomorrow never, or always, comes,
does the future last forever?
Jon Wagner
Los Angeles, California
2003

"Untitled Backdrop (Site of Winona
Ryder shoplifting arrest, 12/14/01)", acrylic on muslin
|