       
|
|
sol
le witt by sabine russ
Sol LeWitt: New Structures ACE Gallery
New YorkIn the six rooms of the ACE
Gallery New York, which branch off from a long majestic hallway and which
evoke imagination of postmodern castle architecture rather than a traditional
gallery, Sol LeWitt installed his New Structures. Solidly built out of
regularly laid concrete blocks, these structures, despite their enormous
dimensions and physical heft, are suffused with a lightness and even a
kind of fragility. At first they seem imposing, crowding the space with
their sheer massiveness. But gradually their fundamental order becomes
clear, an orderliness that is both architecturally sensitive and mathematically
exact. Precisely calibrated, their bases repeat the dimensions of the
floor, although on a reduced scale. From each square, rectangular, or
cross-shaped base, which rise to about waist height, either one, two,
four, or 16 pillars stretch upward, pretending to support the ceiling,
which, however, they do not. This is an allusion to the sometimes narrow
but distinct border between art and architecture, but even more than that,
its an indication to look behind the physical qualities and characteristics
of the structures to their conceptual basis: a possible, but by no means
pre-ordained, development of an infinite system within limits imposed
on it by the found architecture.
One first enters what seems like a triumphal
auditorium or order a big square room with a kind of foundation laid abovegroundthe
grid, which has long figured in LeWitts workon top of which
rise 16 identical towers. Parts of this central structure are quoted in
the other rooms and although fragments, as objects and symbols they are
completely independent (a challenge that LeWitt with Variations of Incomplete
Open Cubes, 1974, accepted to the extreme). One can walk around these
concrete objets, perhaps quickening ones step like someone lost,
and increasingly uneasy, in a labyrinth of logic. And what one suspects
at first is that this room is inhumanly perfect, it needs no audience,
neither does the next one, and the following is also enough, in and of
itself. Size, variability, and the multiplying character of the structures
seem to dominate the viewer, but then a key role is given to the viewer
and the viewers perspective. Moving around the structures, one becomes
an active part within the geometric system. According to the angle of
vision, one can make out countless variations of forms, fluctuating between
two- and three-dimensional as he is with the rhythm between volume and
emptiness, between statics and kinetics. And while there is something
timeless and unchanging about his New Structures, they are vibrant because
of these rhythms, and their expansions into the rooms have an element
of speed and therefore an element of time. Also, depending on the time
of the day, statics and order are overcome by the sunlight that falls
through the skylights as well as by the shadows that the structures cast
into the room, introducing diagonals that interact with the vertical and
horizontal lines of the structures.
LeWitt addresses his words to the mind
of the viewer, and less to his or her eye of feelings. Certainly, the
physical examination of his work provokes an intellectual one, wherever
that might lead in the end. Even so, before one attempts to locate the
conceptual stating point of the artist, at first there are experiences
of the senses and also emotional ones. Here, although one of the premises
of conceptual art is not to draw attention to the materials used, entering
the space an intense smell of mortar makes one immediately aware of the
raw materials. And even though conceptual work is not out to evoke metaphorical
associations (for the structures are supposed to be exactly what they
are), a host of associations accumulate around LeWitts New Structures,
for instance pyramids, medieval castles, and ancient monoliths. While
employing traditional (perhaps even ancient) building techniques, his
structures dont mimic age, or the effects of age, but instead are
thoroughly new. At the same time, however, they seem like intact contemporary
ruins, and as such they pay homage to both decay and construction.
While LeWitts structures are undoubtedly
beautiful and sublime, even graceful in their austere order, the open
secret behind this is the absurd, the megalomaniacal, and the ridiculous.
LeWitt often uses the encyclopedic discipline in his serial works to the
edge of fanaticism (not without a playful curiosity, though, concerning
when the house of cards might collapse), yet his structures here reveal
a kind of mercy, a certain hospitality, which, however, shouldnt
be confused with harmony, for they remain edgy and challenging. More immediately
restrained by the spaces they inhabit, they are mentally easier to comprehend
as a whole than his multiplying grid structures, open cubes, or wall drawings
(which often seem to end out of the viewers sight, if they end,
and which at times threaten to physically overtax the wall).
Within the borders chosen for these
works there is no room for chance or accident, yet still it is not logic
that triumphs here. There is consistency within the chosen order but there
is no final proof. The fortress of reason remains revocable. LeWitt once
suggested that the possible contents of his projects involve the idea
of error, the idea of infinity, the idea of the subversive. With the help
of arithmetic and number sequences (and perhaps also with exuberant laughter)
he propels his serial works toward the collapse of the constructed order,
and his impeccable systems conceal, but do not eradicate, a sense of impending
chaos and wildness. With these temporary monuments LeWitt celebrates neither
the rational nor the irrational but their charged, constantly fluctuating
crossing.
|