KENNY
SCHACHTER: BRANDED; SANDRA GERING GALLERY NEW YORK, NEW YORK
A lunch was arranged
with Maxwell Anderson, Whitney leader and contemporary art maven, with
a view towards my involvement with the institution on some level. Word
came back that there was a conflict due to the fact that I support my
life and curating by selling the work of other artists. Coincidentally
or not, a day later Bice Curiger of Parkett Magazine, who interviewed
me for an editorial position, mentioned the same issue. Pariah status
was accorded to me because doing more than one thing in the art world
allegedly impinges on integrity. I was ineluctably part of a dreaded breed:
dealers. This begot the invitation for the show which was my profile with
the word Dealer scrawled on my face á la Prince when he only appeared
in public with Slave on his, to lobby for terminating a record contract.
Starting with the worst: the problem with not having the competence to
do something yourself is that you have to rely on the incompetence of
others. One of the cornerstone pieces in the show, a Portrait Machine,
at best rarely functioned as it was intended since the internal mechanics
were never properly fleshed out. The concept was a non-static method to
hang and view family or art photographs, which consisted of a computer
printed vinyl scroll with a motor to forward and reverse the images, housed
in a clear Plexiglas frame, in the vein of the latest Apple computers.
A more successful attempt was the work Princess Di Computer Carpet,
a giant sticker in three parts, cut perspectively in a corner of the gallery
installed on the walls and floor. Removed from the original tabloid picture
were people, text and context; trees, flowers, and a boundless passageway
remained. The result was a three-dimensional pastel colored field with
painterly qualities, simultaneously resembling a commercial photo studio.
Adhered directly to the gallery surfaces, the piece had a pleasing fugitive
aspect in that after the show it was peeled off and discarded.
A new technology developed for cigarette industry advertising enabled
an image to appear on a lightbox when not switched on, which I found funny
in relation to art only plugged in during cocktail parties. For Liz-a,
I overlaid four images of a haggard looking Liz Taylor, and a bloated,
indulgent Liza Minelli and connected a computer timer that flickered on
and off. When off, Liz was visible, and when powered, a crossbred monster
of the two heads fused together evincing a post-celebrity take on consumer
scrutiny and consumption of stars, reminiscent of Warhol and Cady Noland
(excuse the hubris).
The title of the show, Branding, derived from the creation
of a line of consumer products including tools, silverware, wallpaper,
mugs and shirts, under the rubric: Shovelware.com. As a sufferer of obsessive-compulsive
disorder, the shovel shaped spoon inspired the collection, referencing
the act of shoveling food in a serial manner without regard to hunger.
The remaining tableware were shaped as farm implements, a sword, a devils
pitchfork, and a switchblade. Tools, cast in translucent lady-like shades
in resin, also aped the Apple esthetic. There was an alluring box cutter
which could pose as an undetectable designer weapon for high school students
in the know. In a move that obstructed the pieces from being seen in their
own right, the tools and silverware were cluttered together on a lightbox
table in the form of a shovel, lit by blinding florescent bulbs so strong
they practically prevented direct viewing. This hodgepodge resembled the
hallmark sensibility of any one of my curated group exhibitions. A re-composed
8 x 10 inch Paul Thek painting from 79 was transformed into a 12
x 4 foot sheet of wall covering. Taking an historically significant conceptual
painting and dumbing it down to the point where it is reduced to purely
decorative is not as easy as it appears.
T-shirts were draped over pipes on the wall in a grid formation adorned
with computer transfers of manipulated appropriated imagery, text, and
original graphics. Subject matter spanned the many times operated upon
face of Jocelyn Wildenstein, to Pavarotti with a gaping mouth and heaping
forkful of pasta. The moniker Art Fag was emblazoned on mugs
and shirts akin to the emblem for the Broadway show Art and
Y me? accompanied a depiction of a falling plane with Y2K
on the tale wing. Though the objects were cited in the press as mock
commodities, shirts and mugs sold briskly at $20 each, and I have
very crass intentions of profiting from the mass production and dissemination
of the items. A 30 second video TV spot which intermittently aired on
the VH-1 cable network advertised Shovelwear.com, accessible on the web,
and the gallery show. The commercial sophomorically spoofed sex, art and
selling on television, but nonetheless had a catchy beat.
Ken Johnson of The NY Times termed Branding an uneven show,
highlighting the silverware and a piece entitled Group Show
which was a liquid nitrogen tank supposedly containing the sperm of six
contemporary artists: Donald Baechler, Rob Pruitt, Hiroshi Sunairi, Robert
Chambers, Lawrence Seward, and myself. The essence of the work related
to the frenzy to predetermine and engineer the outcome of a birth, as
well as the intense desire to possess a product of the artists own
hand (one could say). The level of unorthodox reproductive activity today
encompasses choosing among a collection of fashion models as egg donors
from the internet, for $50,000 a pop; or, engaging in sperm spinning,
which is a method by which the outcome of having a girl can be increased
to 75%. Why not own an incorporeal, preserved bit of the artist rather
than be bogged down by art itself?
In the end, the term uneven can symbolize more than the disjointed character
of my first NY one person exhibition in the 12 years I have been in the
professional art world. Uneven can reflect an innate tenet of human nature
which describes the highs, lows and in-betweens experienced on an everyday
basis by all. Not such a bad thing to behold.
Kenny Schachter
New York, New York
1999

|